[PHPTAL] require_once vs autoloading

[Kornel Lesiński]

On 02-06-2010 at 11:10:43 Robert Goldsmith <rgoldsmith at names.co.uk> wrote:

>> Why would someone choose to replace PHPTAL's autoload with something  
>> else? (I'm not implying it's perfect or such, just wondering what  
>> problem would such option solve).
>
> If people already have autoloader code and wish to use only one  
> autoloader in their application or if they find the autoloader they are  
> already using conflicts with the phptal one then it would be good to  
> allow them to disable the phptal autoloader.

require_once "PHPTAL.php";
spl_autoload_unregister(array('PHPTAL','autoload'));
// if needed: spl_autoload_register('__autoload');

Would that be OK?

-- 
regards, Kornel