[mtasc] Re: future mtasc development?

Tristan Schmelcher tristan_schmelcher at alumni.uwaterloo.ca
Tue Aug 17 19:19:58 CEST 2010


Frankly I wouldn't care what repo we used if only Nicholas would respond to
my request for commit access. :(

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Marcin Cieslak <saper at saper.info> wrote:

> Dnia 30.07.2010 Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse at motion-twin.com> napisał/a:
> > Paul Wise a écrit :
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> Since there are clearly people who still need, use and develop mtasc,
> >> how about turning the website over to them to unify all the forks there?
> >> There are at least 3 forks that I am aware of and it would be nice to
> >> have those merged and uploaded to Debian.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just took time (at last) to move the MTASC CVS to google code SVN :
> > http://code.google.com/p/mtasc
>
> Not to start any kind of holy war or something, but why not use Mercurial
> that is already offered by code.google.com.
>
> --Marcin
>
>
> --
> MTASC : no more coffee break while compiling
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.motion-twin.com/pipermail/mtasc/attachments/20100817/721c41e8/attachment.htm


More information about the mtasc mailing list