AW: [mtasc] Quick Poll

[James Johnson]

I agree too.

Benjamin Dobler wrote:

>I absolutely agree!
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: mtasc-bounces at lists.motion-twin.com
>[mailto:mtasc-bounces at lists.motion-twin.com] Im Auftrag von Claus Wahlers
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. April 2005 12:08
>An: MotionTwin ActionScript2 Compiler List
>Betreff: Re: [mtasc] Quick Poll
>
>Wouldn't it maybe make more sense to invest time into developing an
>(open source) framework for the Flash Player (as already mentioned by
>Carlos) and make MTASC ready for Flash Player 8?
>A new player would probably be neat and great for special applications
>and niches, but you'd be always behind Macromedia (ehrm, Adobe).
>cheers,
>claus.
>
>
>On 4/19/05, Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse at motion-twin.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi list,
>>
>>Just a quick poll :
>>    - Java like programming language
>>    - fast and secure virtual machine ( 25 - yes 25 - times faster than
>>Flash one )
>>    - 3D accelerated vector engine
>>    - can import SWF
>>    - IE / Firefox / Safari - Win32 Mac and Linux plugins
>>    - community-oriented and cross-platform open source dev tools
>>    - corporate support contractable
>>Would the following put together would be enough to make people here
>>    
>>
>switch
>  
>
>>from Flash to a new and better technology ?
>>If no what does it needs also ?
>>
>>Nicolas
>>--
>>MTASC : no more coffee break while compiling
>>
>>    
>>
>--
>MTASC : no more coffee break while compiling
>
>--
>MTASC : no more coffee break while compiling
>
>  
>