[mtasc] Getters and Setters

[Nicolas Cannasse]

The only difference is that in the second case , using explicitly addProperty failed to create a "id" field into the class type, so when accessing your "id" field you'll get a type error at compilation unless your class is 'dynamic'.

Nicolas
  Right.  The point is that the MTASC should allow all of these.

    

  Or u could do this ;)

  public function __set__id(id:Number):Void
  {
  };

  public function __get__id():Number
  {
  };


  and in the constructor add:



this.addProperty("id", __get__id, __set__id); Thats what the compiler does to getters and setters wich have the keyword (get or set).

  Greetz Erik

  At 16:42 2-11-2004, you wrote:



  "using getters / setters is good practice"

  This is true, however, you don't need to write getters and setters using the get
  and set key words.  You can just as easily use your own method names and produce
  the same effect.  

  //For example you can write this:
  private  var _id:Number;
  public function set id(id:Number) {
          _id = id;
  }
  public function get id():Number {
          return _id;
  }

  //like this:
  private  var _id:Number;
  public function setID(id:Number) {
          _id = id;
  }
  public function getID():Number {
          return _id;
  }

  This is what I was referring to.  I would recommend, as would most, that you
  should never have public variables in your class and you should always use
  accessor methods to manipulate all variables no matter what syntax you choose.

  -Chris

  -----Original Message-----
  From: mtasc-bounces at lists.motion-twin.com
  [mailto:mtasc-bounces at lists.motion-twin.com] On Behalf Of Brett Errington
  Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:40 PM
  To: 'MotionTwin ActionScript2 Compiler List'
  Subject: RE: [mtasc] Getters and Setters

  Yeah, I'd have to agree

  Using getters / setters is good practice (even though I know they have
  issues in ActionScript as compared to other languages), plus I'm not going
  to be able to use this compiler until they are supported as pretty much all
  my AS2 code uses them and I'm not going to recode everything just to support
  a different compiler.

  Other than that, after giving the compiler some testing yesterday I'm really
  enthusiastic about its future :) great work.

  - Brett 

  -----Original Message-----
  From: mtasc-bounces at lists.motion-twin.com
  [mailto:mtasc-bounces at lists.motion-twin.com] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Sicilia
  Sent: Thursday, 28 October 2004 12:19 AM
  To: MotionTwin ActionScript2 Compiler List
  Subject: Re: [mtasc] Getters and Setters

  Allen, Christopher S. wrote:
  > I'm pretty sure that there is a lot of existing code that is out there
  that uses
  > this style, and it would be a shame if people could not use this stuff
  with your
  > compiler.  I would suggest that you allow this convention to keep MTASC as
  > compatible as possible with the MMC.
  You are rigth.
  I think getter & setter is very importante because all best practice 
  about component use it and all my component use it :)

  just my opinion.

  regards Lorenzo
  --
  MTASC : no more coffee break while compiling

  --
  MTASC : no more coffee break while compiling
  --
  MTASC : no more coffee break while compiling 





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  --
  MTASC : no more coffee break while compiling
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.motion-twin.com/pipermail/mtasc/attachments/20041103/7d9c2249/attachment-0008.htm