[haXe] best strategy to port an existing js library

[Franco Ponticelli]

Ok, that makes perfect sense ;-)

On Dec 7, 2007 5:40 PM, Danny Wilson <danny at decube.net> wrote:

>
> >    /** Static call **/
> >    public static function niceAlert(txt:String):Void = untyped
> > __js__("niceAlert");
> >
> Wow what just happened, that's not even possible :D
>
>
> This will:
>
> class MyWrappingClass
> {
>   static function __init__()
>   {
>     untyped MyWrappingClass.niceAlert = __js__("niceAlert");
>   }
>
>   /** Static call **/
>   public static function niceAlert(txt:String):Void;
>
> }
>
> ofcourse you can wrap it in:
>
> static var niceAlert : Void->Void;
>
> But then you won't get any argument names when it's autocompleted, and the
> generated haxedoc will be less nice :-)
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>      Danny Wilson
>
>
> deCube.net - http://decube.net/
> web application design and development
>
>
> --
> haXe - an open source web programming language
> http://haxe.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.motion-twin.com/pipermail/haxe/attachments/20071207/feea04dc/attachment.htm