[haXe] best strategy to port an existing js library
Franco Ponticelli
franco.ponticelli at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 17:37:54 CET 2007
I don't, but how can you use it in this situation? I can't think any smart
way ...
On Dec 7, 2007 4:27 PM, Benjamin Dasnois <benjamin.dasnois at gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't forget about the magic __js__ too, it could be useful.
>
> On Dec 7, 2007 5:10 PM, Franco Ponticelli <franco.ponticelli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Yes, I think you are correct. The only two options are depicted in the
> > example below... any other idea?
> >
> > // js library
> > function niceAlert(txt) {
> > alert("### " + txt + " ###");
> > }
> >
> > // haxe code
> > class Main {
> > public static function main() {
> > Main.msg("hello to you");
> > Main.msg2("goodbye");
> > }
> >
> > public static var msg : String -> Void = untyped niceAlert;
> >
> > public static function msg2(s : String) {
> > untyped niceAlert(s);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Franco.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 7, 2007 3:42 PM, Ian <bcposn802 at sneakemail.com > wrote:
> > > how would you call a javascript function from haXe? It seems like
> > > extern only works with classes.
> > > I guess I could wrap the javascript functions in a javascript class.
> > >
> > > -ianxm
> > >
> > >
> > > Franco Ponticelli franco.ponticelli-at-gmail.com |haxe| wrote:
> > > > There is no loader and I doubt you need one since you can include
> your
> > > > JS library just before the haXe generated file.
> > > > About wrapping you can use both extern or typedef depending on what
> > > > you are implementing.
> > > > In your case the extern could be the right solution.
> > > >
> > > > extern HelloClass {
> > > > public function new() : Void;
> > > > public function showText() : String;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Pay attention to the case of fields that in haXe must start with a
> > > > lower case letter. This can be origin to incompabilities.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Franco.
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 7, 2007 11:00 AM, picnic < bitvolt at gmail.com
> > >
> > > > <mailto:bitvolt at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > hi
> > > > what is best strategy to port an existing js library? How is
> > > > encapsulation done, e.g. for an js class in a separate file:
> > > >
> > > > -------------HelloClass.js------------------
> > > > function HelloClass(){
> > > > var m_text = "Hello World";
> > > > this.ShowText = DisplayText;
> > > > function DisplayText(){
> > > > alert( m_text );
> > > > return;}}
> > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > i guess there should be some kind of a loader function in
> haxe.js
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > picnic
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > haXe - an open source web programming language
> > > > http://haxe.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > haXe - an open source web programming language
> > > http://haxe.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > haXe - an open source web programming language
> > http://haxe.org
> >
>
> --
> haXe - an open source web programming language
> http://haxe.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.motion-twin.com/pipermail/haxe/attachments/20071207/e3163a79/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Haxe
mailing list