[haXe] Debugger Request.
hank williams
hank777 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 22 15:54:57 CEST 2006
On 8/22/06, Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse at motion-twin.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps you are right. I am always open to learning. What is it that
> > you think I am missing?
>
> For instance : type system and type checking, semantics, architecture
> expressibility.
>
> In that area, haxe has the following features that AS3 does not have :
> - anonymous type
> - functional types
> - type parameters
> - enums
> - typedef
> - dynamics
> - iterators
>
> Nicolas
>
> --
I could not possibly have included the list of things that you just
did in a sentence designed to convey a simple meaning.
As far as I am concerned, for a simple conversation, everything you
conveyed falls into the category of language syntax. Perhaps you would
have been happier if I said instead of "similar syntax" similar
"syntax and semantics".
I agree that haXe has valuable *features* (or whatever word you want
to use) that AS3 doesnt. But for me, I cannot switch the bulk of my
work to haXe because the features are not strong enough to overcome
the IDE and debugging issue. I will only use haXe for things like
where I need to be cross platform. This includes things where I need
neko, where I need SWHX, or where I need JS. Because for flash
programming, the Flex2 IDE and debugger are just incredibly,
phenomenally, amazingly productive.
Regards
Hank
More information about the Haxe
mailing list